When Science Debunks Gender Theory
Professor René Ecochard
Neuroscience allows us to understand the differences assigned to men and women from conception: this is what emerges from the latest contribution by Professor René Ecochard, from a study that shows in the background all the futility of the different theories based on gender ideology taught everywhere with great reinforcements of public funding.
“We are at an age where neuroscience gives us a window on the greatness of the human being, of man and woman,” even if other sciences “such as theology” offer a complementary perspective, explains Professor René Ecochard, a physician-researcher at the Claude Bernard University of Lyon I, in his latest published work: Homme, femme, ce que nous disent les neurosciences, [Man, woman, what the neurosciences tells us] Paris, Argtège, 2022.
It is a work that has not made the headlines in the progressive media, and for good reason. The researcher explains, with a concern for dissemination, what the Y chromosome, characteristic of the man who is “XY,” unlike the woman who is “XX,” brings specifically to the male gender.
“Even before the little child is implanted in the uterus, it is surprising that one can distinguish a boy from a girl from the first three or four days of pregnancy,” René Ecochard declared on Radio-Maria, on June 27, 2024. But that’s not all.
Neuroscience also notes a differentiation of the brain of men or women from the first months of pregnancy: “around the seventh week, it is the sexual organs that develop. In boys, testosterone will flood the embryo until its brain is transformed: it will be more “compartmentalized,” unlike that of the young girl,” the researcher specifies.
In support of his demonstration, he cites the results obtained by his British colleague, Simon Baron-Cohen, who states that at birth “the brain of a little boy is already 'wired' for analysis, while that of a little girl is for intuition.” Therefore, one of the functions of the Y chromosome would rather be to slow down what pushes towards intuition in order to push towards analysis. The observation is also similar in other mammals where females intuit the needs of their young.
The researcher at the University of Lyon I states: “The Y chromosome gives, from life in utero, a beginning of complementarity between the sexes. In addition, neuroscience shows that the male brain finishes its development around the age of 24, that of the female around the age of 22. The Y chromosome thus participates in the development of the male personality from the beginning and is active in the cells until the end of this man's life.”
This is why René Ecochard concludes that it is “a shame to let an adolescent believe that he is already emotionally and psychologically constituted when his body and brain are still developing.” Which reveals all the lies and the danger brought by those who promote sexual transition among the youngest, in the name of an illusory gender dysphoria.
A positive aspect of the development of scientific techniques is thus to reinforce what is observed in nature, far from idealistic delusions. René Ecochard shows the contribution of a recent science, epigenetics, which observes certain “marks” which, in little boys for example, will “masculinize” their brain throughout their growth.
But the researcher insists: these “epigenetic marks do not make us robots, unlike animals.” Thus, some cetaceans or birds form faithful couples throughout their existence: in humans, epigenetic marks exist to push us to fidelity, but they can be countered by the misuse we would make of our freedom.
Interviewed by Le Figaro shortly after the publication of his book, René Ecochard addresses the related issue of the “harms of the contraceptive pill” established by neuroscience. “The natural hormones of the young girl, from puberty onwards, feminize her brain as much as her body, but the contraceptive pill given to young girls is mainly made of progestins.”
“These prevent the natural secretion of estrogens, thus depriving the young girl of the support necessary for the continuation of the sexualization of her brain and the growth of her personality. If the transformations of the young girl’s brain do not take place, hormonal replacement in adulthood will not be able to replace the lack.” Enough to give conscientious doctors food for thought.
The researcher from the Claude Bernard University states it clearly: “There is a great deal of confusion surrounding the question of homosexuality, the latter is not an identity, it is not directed towards the transmission of life. We explain [at the level of neuroscience - Ed.] the attraction of men to women because of cell nuclei that develop in boys to cause an attraction to femininity,” he explains.
And he concludes: “There is much to do to prepare boys for their role as men and fathers; we must identify our deficits and get support to become what we are.”
(Sources : Radio-Maria/Le Figaro – FSSPX.Actualités)
Illustration : Book Node